Comment by hajile
10 months ago
Both were wrong, but only one was corrected.
> If the maintainer (or anyone) is unreasonable, then the only approach is to have someone with more authority weigh in and make the decision to bypass their objections or sustain them (which is sort of the direction this was going before the diatribes).
While they were arguing, Linus said nothing. While the maintainer was issuing ultimatums, Linus said nothing. Linus only said something when social media forced his hand. This is the real issue.
You’re right - add insufficient leadership to the list as well.
IMO, it seems inconsistent to green light R4L and not declare a clear policy for Rust code interacting with C code without adding a hard dependency (and if it WAS declared, not enforcing it).
The only benefit of doubt I can give is that there wasn’t enough time for Linus etc to weigh in before the thread got sidetracked (and the decision became much more politically charged). It’s unclear what would have happened if only the maintainer was unreasonable.
Apparently GregH(?) had already stepped in earlier to resolve the issue before it blew up again. But I’ve not been following it closely.
>Both were wrong, but only one was corrected.
People are wrong in LKML often.
This time, somebody was wrong in a much worse way than usual.