Comment by mort96
10 months ago
I know who Luna is.
When your argument is "a person said it so it's probably true", the natural next step is to ascertain whether that person is credible or not. That's not an instance of the ad hominem fallacy.
10 months ago
I know who Luna is.
When your argument is "a person said it so it's probably true", the natural next step is to ascertain whether that person is credible or not. That's not an instance of the ad hominem fallacy.
It does not matter how "unhinged and obsessive" (that's an ad-hominem attack, btw), the co-creator of a fictional character is. They are still co-creator. They know who the other co-creator is; it's Hector Martin.
You know this.
You also know the document you linked affirms that "Asahi Lina" (not a real person) did not like being "doxxed" on the date that Luna said Asahi Lina was Hector Martin.
What I take from that is Hector Martin wrote the document. Do you disagree?
What I'm saying is I do not take Luna's word for it. I do not consider her a reliable source.
Fine, that's your opinion (it's not mine), so please discuss the document you brought up, that you've auspiciously avoided mentioning for the past two replies.
The document you brought up says "Unfortunately, on August 1st, Luna publicly: Doxxed me with a real-world identity". On that day, Luna said Asahi Lina was Hector Martin. Discuss.
2 replies →