Also i'd love to dig into how I should rephrase my commentary. I meant to draw attention to the selection of members of a known swatting community in doge recruitment.
Based upon the tactics reported by government employees, doge has conducted exfiltration and installed spyware, making them a cybercriminal outfit that exists in a quasi-legal grey area that exists before court procedures can physically occur.
I would therefore posit that there are two qualities (cybercriminal, and under legal duress and thus maleable) and therefore it is logically consistent to use ambiguity in my cursory and real assessment of the situation.
I was scolding ahmeneeroe-v2 for posting "You are an idiot" in response to your post at https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43017356. If you don't see that comment, it's because you don't have 'showdead' turned on in your profile.
It's pretty worrisome if the chain of replies (i.e. who's replying to who) is that unclear, though! Do you not see a [dead] node in the tree just above my post?
Personal attacks will get you banned here, so please don't do this.
https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
Sorry dang.
Who was personally attacked?
Also i'd love to dig into how I should rephrase my commentary. I meant to draw attention to the selection of members of a known swatting community in doge recruitment.
Based upon the tactics reported by government employees, doge has conducted exfiltration and installed spyware, making them a cybercriminal outfit that exists in a quasi-legal grey area that exists before court procedures can physically occur.
I would therefore posit that there are two qualities (cybercriminal, and under legal duress and thus maleable) and therefore it is logically consistent to use ambiguity in my cursory and real assessment of the situation.
I was scolding ahmeneeroe-v2 for posting "You are an idiot" in response to your post at https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43017356. If you don't see that comment, it's because you don't have 'showdead' turned on in your profile.
It's pretty worrisome if the chain of replies (i.e. who's replying to who) is that unclear, though! Do you not see a [dead] node in the tree just above my post?
If you believe it is a general tangent I would argue that it is highly topical and important not just to the general but centrally to hackers.
Fair warning. Thanks Dang