Comment by boxed 2 years ago [flagged] 4 comments boxed Reply UncleMeat 2 years ago This isn't what hearsay means. boxed 2 years ago No source, a question mark after, super vague reference. How is that not hearsay? soylentcola 2 years ago The person in question published it openly on the internet (Twitter). Not gonna bother digging up the proof again because it's been widely reported and not denied - just minimized as some cheeky edgelord humor. 1 reply →
UncleMeat 2 years ago This isn't what hearsay means. boxed 2 years ago No source, a question mark after, super vague reference. How is that not hearsay? soylentcola 2 years ago The person in question published it openly on the internet (Twitter). Not gonna bother digging up the proof again because it's been widely reported and not denied - just minimized as some cheeky edgelord humor. 1 reply →
boxed 2 years ago No source, a question mark after, super vague reference. How is that not hearsay? soylentcola 2 years ago The person in question published it openly on the internet (Twitter). Not gonna bother digging up the proof again because it's been widely reported and not denied - just minimized as some cheeky edgelord humor. 1 reply →
soylentcola 2 years ago The person in question published it openly on the internet (Twitter). Not gonna bother digging up the proof again because it's been widely reported and not denied - just minimized as some cheeky edgelord humor. 1 reply →
This isn't what hearsay means.
No source, a question mark after, super vague reference. How is that not hearsay?
The person in question published it openly on the internet (Twitter). Not gonna bother digging up the proof again because it's been widely reported and not denied - just minimized as some cheeky edgelord humor.
1 reply →