← Back to context Comment by boxed 5 months ago [flagged] 4 comments boxed Reply UncleMeat 5 months ago This isn't what hearsay means. boxed 5 months ago No source, a question mark after, super vague reference. How is that not hearsay? soylentcola 5 months ago The person in question published it openly on the internet (Twitter). Not gonna bother digging up the proof again because it's been widely reported and not denied - just minimized as some cheeky edgelord humor. 1 reply →
UncleMeat 5 months ago This isn't what hearsay means. boxed 5 months ago No source, a question mark after, super vague reference. How is that not hearsay? soylentcola 5 months ago The person in question published it openly on the internet (Twitter). Not gonna bother digging up the proof again because it's been widely reported and not denied - just minimized as some cheeky edgelord humor. 1 reply →
boxed 5 months ago No source, a question mark after, super vague reference. How is that not hearsay? soylentcola 5 months ago The person in question published it openly on the internet (Twitter). Not gonna bother digging up the proof again because it's been widely reported and not denied - just minimized as some cheeky edgelord humor. 1 reply →
soylentcola 5 months ago The person in question published it openly on the internet (Twitter). Not gonna bother digging up the proof again because it's been widely reported and not denied - just minimized as some cheeky edgelord humor. 1 reply →
This isn't what hearsay means.
No source, a question mark after, super vague reference. How is that not hearsay?
The person in question published it openly on the internet (Twitter). Not gonna bother digging up the proof again because it's been widely reported and not denied - just minimized as some cheeky edgelord humor.
1 reply →