← Back to context Comment by boxed 8 days ago [flagged] 4 comments boxed Reply UncleMeat 8 days ago This isn't what hearsay means. boxed 8 days ago No source, a question mark after, super vague reference. How is that not hearsay? soylentcola 8 days ago The person in question published it openly on the internet (Twitter). Not gonna bother digging up the proof again because it's been widely reported and not denied - just minimized as some cheeky edgelord humor. 1 reply →
UncleMeat 8 days ago This isn't what hearsay means. boxed 8 days ago No source, a question mark after, super vague reference. How is that not hearsay? soylentcola 8 days ago The person in question published it openly on the internet (Twitter). Not gonna bother digging up the proof again because it's been widely reported and not denied - just minimized as some cheeky edgelord humor. 1 reply →
boxed 8 days ago No source, a question mark after, super vague reference. How is that not hearsay? soylentcola 8 days ago The person in question published it openly on the internet (Twitter). Not gonna bother digging up the proof again because it's been widely reported and not denied - just minimized as some cheeky edgelord humor. 1 reply →
soylentcola 8 days ago The person in question published it openly on the internet (Twitter). Not gonna bother digging up the proof again because it's been widely reported and not denied - just minimized as some cheeky edgelord humor. 1 reply →
This isn't what hearsay means.
No source, a question mark after, super vague reference. How is that not hearsay?
The person in question published it openly on the internet (Twitter). Not gonna bother digging up the proof again because it's been widely reported and not denied - just minimized as some cheeky edgelord humor.
1 reply →