← Back to context Comment by boxed 1 year ago [flagged] 4 comments boxed Reply UncleMeat 1 year ago This isn't what hearsay means. boxed 1 year ago No source, a question mark after, super vague reference. How is that not hearsay? soylentcola 1 year ago The person in question published it openly on the internet (Twitter). Not gonna bother digging up the proof again because it's been widely reported and not denied - just minimized as some cheeky edgelord humor. 1 reply →
UncleMeat 1 year ago This isn't what hearsay means. boxed 1 year ago No source, a question mark after, super vague reference. How is that not hearsay? soylentcola 1 year ago The person in question published it openly on the internet (Twitter). Not gonna bother digging up the proof again because it's been widely reported and not denied - just minimized as some cheeky edgelord humor. 1 reply →
boxed 1 year ago No source, a question mark after, super vague reference. How is that not hearsay? soylentcola 1 year ago The person in question published it openly on the internet (Twitter). Not gonna bother digging up the proof again because it's been widely reported and not denied - just minimized as some cheeky edgelord humor. 1 reply →
soylentcola 1 year ago The person in question published it openly on the internet (Twitter). Not gonna bother digging up the proof again because it's been widely reported and not denied - just minimized as some cheeky edgelord humor. 1 reply →
This isn't what hearsay means.
No source, a question mark after, super vague reference. How is that not hearsay?
The person in question published it openly on the internet (Twitter). Not gonna bother digging up the proof again because it's been widely reported and not denied - just minimized as some cheeky edgelord humor.
1 reply →