← Back to context Comment by boxed 10 months ago [flagged] 4 comments boxed Reply UncleMeat 10 months ago This isn't what hearsay means. boxed 10 months ago No source, a question mark after, super vague reference. How is that not hearsay? soylentcola 10 months ago The person in question published it openly on the internet (Twitter). Not gonna bother digging up the proof again because it's been widely reported and not denied - just minimized as some cheeky edgelord humor. 1 reply →
UncleMeat 10 months ago This isn't what hearsay means. boxed 10 months ago No source, a question mark after, super vague reference. How is that not hearsay? soylentcola 10 months ago The person in question published it openly on the internet (Twitter). Not gonna bother digging up the proof again because it's been widely reported and not denied - just minimized as some cheeky edgelord humor. 1 reply →
boxed 10 months ago No source, a question mark after, super vague reference. How is that not hearsay? soylentcola 10 months ago The person in question published it openly on the internet (Twitter). Not gonna bother digging up the proof again because it's been widely reported and not denied - just minimized as some cheeky edgelord humor. 1 reply →
soylentcola 10 months ago The person in question published it openly on the internet (Twitter). Not gonna bother digging up the proof again because it's been widely reported and not denied - just minimized as some cheeky edgelord humor. 1 reply →
This isn't what hearsay means.
No source, a question mark after, super vague reference. How is that not hearsay?
The person in question published it openly on the internet (Twitter). Not gonna bother digging up the proof again because it's been widely reported and not denied - just minimized as some cheeky edgelord humor.
1 reply →