And it's not a big org or one with a strict division of responsibilities between clumsy juniors who update the website and carefully vetted experienced pros who do the real work, so this is likely to be representative the calibre of developer currently trawling through sensitive government databases....
This reductionist way of thinking isn't doing you or anyone any good. Unless you have at least some circumstantial evidence hinting at that, apart from "someone disagrees with me so they must be x", this isn't providing any value to the discussion.
You should probably address your criticisms to the gp. Giving trolls a pass and wagging fingers at people who reject their specious arguments is an increasingly common failure pattern.
This isnt "getting hacked". This is basic 101 kids stuff. Any competent org wouldnt allow this anywhere near their dev environments let alone prod.
And it's not a big org or one with a strict division of responsibilities between clumsy juniors who update the website and carefully vetted experienced pros who do the real work, so this is likely to be representative the calibre of developer currently trawling through sensitive government databases....
Found the DOGE employee
[flagged]
Who cares about security. As long as the libs are crying, right?
1 reply →
What agency is that?
4 replies →
This reductionist way of thinking isn't doing you or anyone any good. Unless you have at least some circumstantial evidence hinting at that, apart from "someone disagrees with me so they must be x", this isn't providing any value to the discussion.
You should probably address your criticisms to the gp. Giving trolls a pass and wagging fingers at people who reject their specious arguments is an increasingly common failure pattern.
2 replies →
Their reasoning was "well google also has bugs", comparing their bounty system to an embarrassing security mistake.
Imagine Google doing this performative stunt and getting hacked.