Comment by titanomachy 1 year ago Weird. Why can’t you patch your local version to include the name of your project? 3 comments titanomachy Reply zem 1 year ago if your project is a library no one can use it without a similar patch benatkin 1 year ago https://youtu.be/E99FnoYqoII?si=r22RK3xy3NJoDnQr x0x0 1 year ago That's a poor analogy. Rails has always had "here's a sharp knife; be careful with it, but you're an adult so use it how you will" philosophy. So Rails comes with recommendations for use, but not mandates.
benatkin 1 year ago https://youtu.be/E99FnoYqoII?si=r22RK3xy3NJoDnQr x0x0 1 year ago That's a poor analogy. Rails has always had "here's a sharp knife; be careful with it, but you're an adult so use it how you will" philosophy. So Rails comes with recommendations for use, but not mandates.
x0x0 1 year ago That's a poor analogy. Rails has always had "here's a sharp knife; be careful with it, but you're an adult so use it how you will" philosophy. So Rails comes with recommendations for use, but not mandates.
if your project is a library no one can use it without a similar patch
https://youtu.be/E99FnoYqoII?si=r22RK3xy3NJoDnQr
That's a poor analogy. Rails has always had "here's a sharp knife; be careful with it, but you're an adult so use it how you will" philosophy. So Rails comes with recommendations for use, but not mandates.