Comment by llamaimperative
10 months ago
Legal (first amendment) free speech certainly allows him to ban whoever he wants.
However, this is the exact behavior from prior owners that he counter-positioned himself against, allegedly pursuing a broader “free speech absolutism.” That philosophy certainly would not permit arbitrary bans of people he doesn’t like.
These mental gymnastics are remarkable to see.
I think we’re all in agreement and the person you’re replying to is being sarcastic ;-)