Comment by llamaimperative
5 days ago
Legal (first amendment) free speech certainly allows him to ban whoever he wants.
However, this is the exact behavior from prior owners that he counter-positioned himself against, allegedly pursuing a broader “free speech absolutism.” That philosophy certainly would not permit arbitrary bans of people he doesn’t like.
These mental gymnastics are remarkable to see.
I think we’re all in agreement and the person you’re replying to is being sarcastic ;-)