Comment by guappa

6 days ago

> Then you do not have free speech

Neither do you, unless you redefined it to be the super narrow description that you gave. So you can freely be censored but keep believing you have freedom.

You're the poster child of how europeans imagine usa citizens.

Governments can't censor what their citizens say. That's the only protection covered in the US constitution.

Private citizens and companies can censor. Twitter can have rules of conduct or terms of use, for example, and you have to play by their rules when posting on their service. The government isn't involved at all (twitter files not withstanding).

  • I understand how it works. I'm arguing you guys keep saying you have this "freedom of speech" when in fact you have absolutely nothing.

I guess.. it must be shocking to you? Seemingly absurd perhaps.

You can't say what you want in a shopping mall. They can decide who gets to stay in their premises, and for whatever reason they can eject you.

All the free speech cases, have been about government stopping speech. Whether its about deceny laws, or sedition - its always been the government vs a person / corporation.

So yeah - these have been the rights you lived under for all your life. Its never changed.

That is the operating definition of free speech that has worked in America since I started working in this space.

  • > That is the operating definition of free speech that has worked in America since I started working in this space.

    It hasn't worked. But you're too set in "USA IS PERFECT!" mindset to objectively think about it.

    • Oh. I come from and am In a country with much stricter Free Speech laws.

      I think all of them are pretty crap for today’s environment.

      But yes - the operating definition of Free speech, the one enforceable in courts, the one you have lived under, is the one I outlined.

      Namely - no government over reach in speech. Not that people can’t do what they want as private individuals, and now corporations.

      So you can in theory, have a corporation buy up all the local news channels, and then have them share one kind of point of view. It’s perfectly free speech.

      You could stream porn, and the courts would side by you for your right to free speech.

      This doesn’t mean you wont get sued for piracy, or actually earn money through your project - you still need a service people want.

      I’m dead serious, you can check if you like - but these are the rules you live under even right now.

      1 reply →