Comment by gosub100 5 months ago * Unless you're secretary of state. 3 comments gosub100 Reply throwaway5752 5 months ago What happened in that case, and do you believe the same standard should be applied currently? gosub100 5 months ago In that case a corrupt politician with lots to hide was able to keep their crimes hidden using the secret service (who defended her house). I do not think that standard should be applied to anyone, ever. throwaway5752 5 months ago She went before Congress for to testify for 11 hours under oath, as a point of fact. I feel like that would be a reasonable next step.The FBI investigation https://www.fbi.gov/news/press-releases/statement-by-fbi-dir... is at odds with your description. It appears nothing was as anywhere as severe as the recent intelligence breach of when DOGE posted NOFORN material publicly (https://abcnews.go.com/US/agency-data-shared-doge-online-spa...)
throwaway5752 5 months ago What happened in that case, and do you believe the same standard should be applied currently? gosub100 5 months ago In that case a corrupt politician with lots to hide was able to keep their crimes hidden using the secret service (who defended her house). I do not think that standard should be applied to anyone, ever. throwaway5752 5 months ago She went before Congress for to testify for 11 hours under oath, as a point of fact. I feel like that would be a reasonable next step.The FBI investigation https://www.fbi.gov/news/press-releases/statement-by-fbi-dir... is at odds with your description. It appears nothing was as anywhere as severe as the recent intelligence breach of when DOGE posted NOFORN material publicly (https://abcnews.go.com/US/agency-data-shared-doge-online-spa...)
gosub100 5 months ago In that case a corrupt politician with lots to hide was able to keep their crimes hidden using the secret service (who defended her house). I do not think that standard should be applied to anyone, ever. throwaway5752 5 months ago She went before Congress for to testify for 11 hours under oath, as a point of fact. I feel like that would be a reasonable next step.The FBI investigation https://www.fbi.gov/news/press-releases/statement-by-fbi-dir... is at odds with your description. It appears nothing was as anywhere as severe as the recent intelligence breach of when DOGE posted NOFORN material publicly (https://abcnews.go.com/US/agency-data-shared-doge-online-spa...)
throwaway5752 5 months ago She went before Congress for to testify for 11 hours under oath, as a point of fact. I feel like that would be a reasonable next step.The FBI investigation https://www.fbi.gov/news/press-releases/statement-by-fbi-dir... is at odds with your description. It appears nothing was as anywhere as severe as the recent intelligence breach of when DOGE posted NOFORN material publicly (https://abcnews.go.com/US/agency-data-shared-doge-online-spa...)
What happened in that case, and do you believe the same standard should be applied currently?
In that case a corrupt politician with lots to hide was able to keep their crimes hidden using the secret service (who defended her house). I do not think that standard should be applied to anyone, ever.
She went before Congress for to testify for 11 hours under oath, as a point of fact. I feel like that would be a reasonable next step.
The FBI investigation https://www.fbi.gov/news/press-releases/statement-by-fbi-dir... is at odds with your description. It appears nothing was as anywhere as severe as the recent intelligence breach of when DOGE posted NOFORN material publicly (https://abcnews.go.com/US/agency-data-shared-doge-online-spa...)