Comment by ghaff
4 months ago
Provisional hires (which often exist in theory but they're pretty much a formality in general) don't work for the most part. Lot of overhead for the company. And in many cases you're asking for the candidate to quit a job and possibly relocate on the possibility they'll get a new position assuming that they click in a short time interval.
So, accept the overhead as the cost of hiring the right people?
There's even more overhead on the people being provisionally hired.
Yes, sometimes things just don't work out. But, if someone quits a job and maybe relocates, that's a big personal cost. It's just the way things work in some limited contexts (e.g. professional sports) but it's not and shouldn't be the norm.
I suppose you can give a huge sign-on bonus with no claw-back provision, but that's never going to happen in most cases.
I'm fully convinced the way to make better hires is to invest more, which will be more expensive. Which wouldn't be a problem unless we expected something else. It starts with quitting pretending the current process is working, or even close to optimal.
4 replies →
Who said anything about relocation? That has to be a tiny percentage of hires.
Relocation used to be pretty common for professional jobs. Don't know about today when there's more remote work. And maybe companies aren't as willing to pay for in general.