Comment by notarealllama

2 days ago

One of my favorite tech interview questions for any position is, "Describe in excruciating detail, everything that happens when you request and load a website in your browser."

You learn a LOT about how a candidate thinks and the depth of their knowledge.

i feel this question correlates more with the generation of the SWE more than anything.

expecting current gen SWEs to talk about network layer protocols while answering this is kinda the same as expecting 1990s SWEs to include wire physics and dispersion statistics in their answer to this question.

Depth alone isn't always a good indicator. We have to move on from some of the low level stuff at some point and it is okay for engineers to know in detail about things that have been solved long back.

  • Surely that depends what your hiring them for?

    The nice thing about the website load question is that it touches every part of the stack. You could talk for an hour about rendering on screen at the OS level, or network protocols, or server stuff, or web client stuff, or data center stuff, or …

    Really to answer the question in its full entirety would be the equivalent of that “Everything that goes into a pencil” essay. You could build an entire college curriculum just out of that question.

    • > that “Everything that goes into a pencil” essay

      which one! I tried googling this but without quotes it gives me clickbait and with quotes it only points to this comment. :(

      2 replies →

  • I think it's fine to ask a web developer how web pages are served.

    If they can talk about network layer protocols, then that tells you something. If the next candidate's understanding stops at knitting libraries together, then that's also notable.

    Even if it's not a discriminating factor in hiring, it still helps you flesh out the candidate.

  • 100% a generation thing.

    Been around long enough so I've written my own CSS framework, server-side framework, web browser, web server, sent bits over Ethernet, written assembler, programmed a FPGA, built circuits, AND have a electrical engineering degree... and YET, _ABSOLUTELY NONE_ of this is useful _99%_ of the time.

    So meh. If I want you to do frontend, I will ask you frontend questions. Hopefully you can go deep on a11y and that's what I care about.

    (But the 1% of the time when I can precisely step through a whole stack is also fun.)

    • Exactly, someone who can answer where media queries fall in terms of loading priorities for FE (when hiring for that.)

      Electrical engineering is a whole nother thing!

      1 reply →

  • Yes, I would drop the “in excruciating detail” and “everything”. The level of detail the interviewee starts at or goes down to by default is also informative.

The only good answer here is "breadth first, or depth first"?

If they say "depth first", go all the way down to electrons bumping into each other on the wire.

It's an "I'm so smart, are you so smart" question, the only right approach is a smart aleck approach.

I work on web browsers for a decade+ now, and worked on network protocols for a decade+, and it's not a question I'd consider in any way high signal. If this particular area matters to you, ask a problem in the space. "Web page X doesn't load, figure out why". It shows you way more than "please regurgitate every detail"

  • That's exactly the point - sometimes too much detail or focused on wrong thing can ve distracting.

    But having a frontend engineer aware of Safari on iOS or macOS vs assuming chrome compatibility, or a SRE aware of abusive UDP http2 / h3 stuff...

    Again the beauty is in the flexibility and scope of something normies take for granted, and this video delves into some of the esoterics of this topic!

    • Yep, having a video explaining it in detail is great. It's absolutely interesting. (I mean, I would say that, wouldn't I ;)

      My objection was to using it as an interview question. An broad open-ended question like that without any guidance what the interviewer cares about is a signal of either copy-pasted hiring practices, or a working culture that doesn't know what it wants. It's also a question with little signal in the noise if you don't give a bit more clarity.

      I mean, fundamentally I'm happy if other companies use the question, more good hires for me, but in terms of "we should really raise the bar on this interviewing thing" I still object :)

      1 reply →

I assume we have to start with the physical action of typing in a url and everything involved in that? Then how the physical keyboard works? Then how the OS handles the input from the keyboard? Then…

"excruciating details"? I don't think I would ever get to the network if you asked that. I would have to cover how you pressing "enter" gets encoded by the keyboard, how the USB bus works, the interrupt processed by the processor, how that context switch happens, how the next instruction is fetched and decoded by the CPU, how the code for the interrupt gets read, TLB, L1/L2 cache, pipelined execution, microinstructions, transistors, ...

Depth-first doesn't work when the depth of reality is basically unlimited.

In former times, this used to be “Describe what happens between pressing a key on the keyboard and the corresponding letter appearing on the screen”. You can go into all sorts of interesting tangents with that topic.

It depends on the role. I suspect the majority of software developers have no clue. The majority of C, C++, C#, Rust, Java, Python people, really don't know, unless their job deals with the browser. Most game devs don't know.

would be fun to do this while stepping through chromium w/ a debugger.

The button on your keyboard is depressed, making a connection between two wires. The circuit is made and interpreted by a microcontroller, which differentiates which key press was made based upon…

What? You said excruciating…

How are you requesting the website? Are you typing into the address bar? Of which browser (and what version)? On which operating system (and what version)? On which hardware platform? Have you configured the address bar to also work as a search bar ("omnibox")? Are you typing a domain name or an IP address? Do you have any entries in your hosts file for the domain name? Is the machine configured to resolve hostnames on the local network? Is the domain name one of those? Are you connected to a network? Is your network connection over Wi-Fi or Ethernet? (or something else?) What is your network card and how is it connected? (If USB, which port? If PCIe, which slot?) What other network interfaces do you have? What access point are you using? Do you have a network switch, and if so, which one? Is your internet service over fiber or cable? Which ISP are you using? Gimme a second to look up their peering...

I could go on but :)

i literally am the inventor of this question.

it's an awful question.