Comment by stavros
1 day ago
I feel like the comment was clear, technical illiteracy leads politicians to believe that they'll be the only ones with access to this backdoor, which isn't true.
1 day ago
I feel like the comment was clear, technical illiteracy leads politicians to believe that they'll be the only ones with access to this backdoor, which isn't true.
The comment's clarity was not questioned. You are passing around the same tired line that because politicians do not understand technology and how it can be used against anyone. Sure computers are new but communication technology is not. All a politician needs to understand is "capability". That is it. "We can read their communications", no degree in CS required. Also, they have power geeks advising them left and right. They know "capabilities" can be misused. They know this.
Is this clear?
>> Kindly explain just what "technical literacy" has to do with the formulation you note.
>> Thank you in advance for clarifying your thought process here.
> The comment's clarity was not questioned.
It isn't necessarily the case that they all care if criminals can get in to the average person's data so long as the authorities also can.
Yeah. Not buying it. They know, or someone smart enough told them that backdoors can be accessed by anyone with enough skill. They just don't care because the people that are asking for this are criminals already and wanting profit off of other people's data.