Comment by photochemsyn
1 day ago
Much better article here.
https://www.pv-magazine.com/2025/02/17/organic-inorganic-per...
This system appears based on tin, not lead, so that's a plus for not generating as much toxic waste. However the lifetime report - 10% efficieny loss over 1000 hour - is why people vastly prefer monocrystalline silicon cells, whose lifetime is easily 200X as long (more like 1000X, but other components of the PV module than the silicon will degrade more on the 200,000 hours timeline).
You'd have to replace these once a year or so to retain >90% of the initial power output, versus mono-Si which lasts for 25 years+.
Not based on this exact paper, but Oxford PV is claiming to have perovskite solar cells that will last 25 years now (and is commercially selling tandem silicon-perovskite cells based on this).
https://undecidedmf.com/how-record-breaking-perovskites-are-...
Submit that as a recommended alternative link to mods by email at hn@ycombinator.com