Even the best LLMs today are just junior devs with a lot of knowledge. They make a lot of the same mistakes junior devs would do. Even the responses, when you point out those mistakes, are the same.
If anything, it's a tool for junior devs to get better and spend more time on the architecture.
Using AI code without fully understanding it (ie operated by a non-programmer) is just recipe for disaster.
Even the best LLMs today are just junior devs with a lot of knowledge. They make a lot of the same mistakes junior devs would do. Even the responses, when you point out those mistakes, are the same.
If anything, it's a tool for junior devs to get better and spend more time on the architecture.
Using AI code without fully understanding it (ie operated by a non-programmer) is just recipe for disaster.
The worst is when you tell it it's made a mistake and it agrees.
"You're right, but I just like wasting your time"
OK then show me a model that can answer honestly and correctly about whether or not it knows something.
Show me a human that can answer honestly and correctly about whether they know something.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43155825