Comment by flir
1 year ago
I haven't read the article. All I know is, Firefox changed their TOS.
> That clearly indicates some "other" future motive
It's training data, isn't it?
(It's always training data).
1 year ago
I haven't read the article. All I know is, Firefox changed their TOS.
> That clearly indicates some "other" future motive
It's training data, isn't it?
(It's always training data).
I was referring to Mozilla's past investment into advertising: https://blog.mozilla.org/en/mozilla/mozilla-anonym-raising-t...
To me that and the new ToS add up, why else would they remove the FAQ entry.
Totally fair, tbh. Stealing data for that purpose has already been normalized, so it's a much easier sell.