Comment by ModernMech

> Russia preferring Trump is nothing to do with Trump

It does because that's the reason Trump colluded with them.

> in fact backfired on them.

How do you figure?

Look around: the US is currently realigning itself diplomatically to favor Russia and turn against traditional allies like Canada/UK and Europe. NATO is hanging by a thread as Trump threatens to invade Greenland. US is capitulating on every demand Russia is making in Ukraine, lifting sanctions, dropping efforts to track kidnapped children, halting funding to Ukraine...

It could hardly be going any better for them! How do you think it backfired?

> doesn't prove he's a Russian agent.

I didn't claim he's a Russian agent, I claimed he colluded with Russia.

> There is no evidence Trump campaign colluded with Russia.

Yes there is and I already told you what that is, but I'll put it in bullet form:

- Lying about over 100 Russian contacts that happened.

- Lying about a hotel deal in Russia that was being put together while Trump was running for office.

- Talking to a Russian spy about hacking his opponent in secret and lying about it when caught.

- Handing campaign data to Russian intelligence officers while they were engaged in active measures to interfere in the election.

- Campaigning using materials from the DNC that Russians hacked specifically to help Trump.

etc. etc.

If that is not evidence, what kind of evidence would you say is evidence of collusion?

> If there was, he would have been indicted.

That he has not been indicted for this is not evidence collusion didn't happen, primarily because, as the Mueller report lays out (and you would know this if you had actually read it) "collusion" is not actually a crime for which one can be indicted under US code.