Comment by forty 5 months ago Empty tag as in <tag /> ? 1 comment forty Reply amy_petrik 5 months ago That's a bit confusing to me, I don't understand. I think that type of tagging can be ambiguous. Just to suggest a better construct:<tag type="tag" class="tag" purpose="tag" tag_subtype="empty" description="this is a emptytag, a subtype of tag" empty="true"></tag>Now, that's not perfect, I would even describe it as minimalist, but I hope it sets you in the right direction!
amy_petrik 5 months ago That's a bit confusing to me, I don't understand. I think that type of tagging can be ambiguous. Just to suggest a better construct:<tag type="tag" class="tag" purpose="tag" tag_subtype="empty" description="this is a emptytag, a subtype of tag" empty="true"></tag>Now, that's not perfect, I would even describe it as minimalist, but I hope it sets you in the right direction!
That's a bit confusing to me, I don't understand. I think that type of tagging can be ambiguous. Just to suggest a better construct:
<tag type="tag" class="tag" purpose="tag" tag_subtype="empty" description="this is a emptytag, a subtype of tag" empty="true"></tag>
Now, that's not perfect, I would even describe it as minimalist, but I hope it sets you in the right direction!