Comment by __s
21 days ago
Fluorinated table salt. Naturally fluorinated water sources. Public healthcare that covers dental
European policy isn't based on modern fluoridation being dangerous, it's based on having alternative systems in place (which vary by country)
In Windsor Ontario, across from Detroit, they took fluoride out of water for nearly a decade before reversing that decision based on results: https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/windsor/fluoride-water-system...
Maybe Utah will be a place with alternative systems, based on another thread it sounds like they have an interesting Mormon safety net. But I would hope states do pilot tests first at least. If studies show that the historic gap in dental health between fluorinated & unfluorinated communities no longer apply, then that would be data driven policy
But it seems like this policy is based on someone's common sense that you shouldn't put minerals in water
> based on another thread it sounds like they have an interesting Mormon safety net
as long as you're Mormon. Approximately 60% of the state.
It’s iodine in table salt not fluoride. In the US.
Never knew that France fluoridated their salt.
"In Switzerland 85% of domestic salt consumed is fluoridated and 67% in Germany. Salt fluoridation schemes are reaching more than one hundred million in Mexico, Colombia, Peru and Cuba. The cost of salt fluoridation is very low, within 0.02 and 0.05 € per year and capita. Children and adults of the low socio-economic strata tend to have substantially more untreated caries than higher strata. Salt fluoridation is by far the cheapest method for improving oral health. "
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24308394/
(Sea salt and Kosher salt are the salts that aren't fluoridated and iodated in those countries, fancy, more expensive salts, regular table salt- and the salt added in commercial/restaurants has both.)
So sure, you don't need to fluoridate the water, if you fluoridate the salt instead. But you have to do it some way or another. And the US and Canada doesn't, at present fluoridate the salt because we have it in the water. Remove it from some people's water but don't add it to the salt because everyone else has it in the water? Bad combination.
“Dual fortification” is mandatory in Mexico.
>Public healthcare that covers dental
laughts nerviously in Dutch
heh, I feel it, I'm in Canada where oral healthcare is deemed cosmetic. Giving us some 22minutes satire: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GZsUp-DHMZ4 "do people really need to see & chew?"
That said, WHO does profiles of dental health, providing comparison:
https://cdn.who.int/media/docs/default-source/country-profil...
https://cdn.who.int/media/docs/default-source/country-profil...
& for my own interest, Canada: https://cdn.who.int/media/docs/default-source/country-profil...
Didn't the NDP and Liberals recently pass universal government payer dental coverage in Canada?
It never made sense that dentistry somehow is considered a separate form of healthcare from the rest of your body.
Especially considering researchers are increasingly finding links between oral health and other conditions such as Alzheimer's heart disease. And that preventative dental care is so much cheaper and less invasive than treating major decay when care is delayed.
1 reply →
Ah yeah with our yearly widening own risk insurance too. Great system… for health insurance companies
yeah what EU country does that? Not Denmark...
Neither Spain apart from under 18 and pulling teeth.
In many US states, Medicaid covers dental. CHIPs, for kids, covers dental in every state.
Look - all for whatever science says is best, but wouldn’t countries with public healthcare also be incentivised to have fluoride in the water to reduce costs/public efficiency of public dental healthcare?
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7546136 over half the table salt in France has fluoride
This Nevada health info has an in depth response on page 5 https://dpbh.nv.gov/uploadedFiles/dpbhnvgov/content/Programs...
this is a red herring. Who cares what other people are doing - we should look at the evidence and make decisions based on that.
the evidence can clme from seeing the results of what other people are doing
1 reply →
themgt quoted the 2% figure to show that the europoors reject fluoride in water, but neglects to mention that tap water often naturally contains significant levels of fluoride already, nevermind other fluoride-fortified foodstuffs.