Comment by RUnconcerned 2 years ago could also be "4" or 4! 4 seems like it would be the most evil option, honestly 5 comments RUnconcerned Reply pjc50 2 years ago The real evil option is C: 2+"22" = 0, 4+"4" = undefined behavior and probably the value of some other variable. sehansen 2 years ago The real horror is "1d9" + 1 = 2, as does PHP: https://3v4l.org/Dn6Sm manwe150 2 years ago I think you meant: "22"+2 = "", and it is not UB to make the second pointer, only to use it hoseja 2 years ago The pointer arithmetic works both ways, same as square brackets. baq 2 years ago or the most sane, depending on context... e.g. awk and perl do this.
pjc50 2 years ago The real evil option is C: 2+"22" = 0, 4+"4" = undefined behavior and probably the value of some other variable. sehansen 2 years ago The real horror is "1d9" + 1 = 2, as does PHP: https://3v4l.org/Dn6Sm manwe150 2 years ago I think you meant: "22"+2 = "", and it is not UB to make the second pointer, only to use it hoseja 2 years ago The pointer arithmetic works both ways, same as square brackets.
manwe150 2 years ago I think you meant: "22"+2 = "", and it is not UB to make the second pointer, only to use it hoseja 2 years ago The pointer arithmetic works both ways, same as square brackets.
The real evil option is C: 2+"22" = 0, 4+"4" = undefined behavior and probably the value of some other variable.
The real horror is "1d9" + 1 = 2, as does PHP: https://3v4l.org/Dn6Sm
I think you meant: "22"+2 = "", and it is not UB to make the second pointer, only to use it
The pointer arithmetic works both ways, same as square brackets.
or the most sane, depending on context... e.g. awk and perl do this.