← Back to context Comment by RUnconcerned 1 year ago could also be "4" or 4! 4 seems like it would be the most evil option, honestly 5 comments RUnconcerned Reply pjc50 1 year ago The real evil option is C: 2+"22" = 0, 4+"4" = undefined behavior and probably the value of some other variable. sehansen 1 year ago The real horror is "1d9" + 1 = 2, as does PHP: https://3v4l.org/Dn6Sm manwe150 1 year ago I think you meant: "22"+2 = "", and it is not UB to make the second pointer, only to use it hoseja 10 months ago The pointer arithmetic works both ways, same as square brackets. baq 1 year ago or the most sane, depending on context... e.g. awk and perl do this.
pjc50 1 year ago The real evil option is C: 2+"22" = 0, 4+"4" = undefined behavior and probably the value of some other variable. sehansen 1 year ago The real horror is "1d9" + 1 = 2, as does PHP: https://3v4l.org/Dn6Sm manwe150 1 year ago I think you meant: "22"+2 = "", and it is not UB to make the second pointer, only to use it hoseja 10 months ago The pointer arithmetic works both ways, same as square brackets.
manwe150 1 year ago I think you meant: "22"+2 = "", and it is not UB to make the second pointer, only to use it hoseja 10 months ago The pointer arithmetic works both ways, same as square brackets.
The real evil option is C: 2+"22" = 0, 4+"4" = undefined behavior and probably the value of some other variable.
The real horror is "1d9" + 1 = 2, as does PHP: https://3v4l.org/Dn6Sm
I think you meant: "22"+2 = "", and it is not UB to make the second pointer, only to use it
The pointer arithmetic works both ways, same as square brackets.
or the most sane, depending on context... e.g. awk and perl do this.