Comment by bigstrat2003
8 months ago
That is, by definition, indirect. So that doesn't qualify as "directly harming" anyone, even if your analysis of those policies is otherwise accurate.
8 months ago
That is, by definition, indirect. So that doesn't qualify as "directly harming" anyone, even if your analysis of those policies is otherwise accurate.
No it isn’t. When people see the anti trans party winning elections they see that as permission to bully trans people. The vote directly leads to abuse.
Yes, it very much is indirect. Direct would be the "anti trans party" passing a law saying that you must bully trans people.
Your definition of direct is terrible
3 replies →