Comment by bambax
15 days ago
Ah, thanks. Yes it couldn't have been 2010 because he died in 2002. But the date this was written is important, otherwise his references to "the last decade" don't mean anything!
15 days ago
Ah, thanks. Yes it couldn't have been 2010 because he died in 2002. But the date this was written is important, otherwise his references to "the last decade" don't mean anything!
Many would say that "the last decade" (with the surrounding context) is timeless, or at least that it is still relevant today.