Comment by pydry
16 days ago
>It's called Import Substitution. Import Substitution: A Tried and Tested Policy for Failure
Which worked exceptionally well for China, South Korea, Japan and pretty well for Russia and India.
16 days ago
>It's called Import Substitution. Import Substitution: A Tried and Tested Policy for Failure
Which worked exceptionally well for China, South Korea, Japan and pretty well for Russia and India.
I think to nurture developing industries, it can be fine, but at some point you have to expose them to competition if you want to exceed what the domestic market can do.
Domestic industries DO compete - both with each other AND with foreign companies which are levied with tariffs.
One of the reason why China's import substitution was almost unreasonably effective was because domestic companies were driven to compete fiercely with each other.
(In America there is a drive to do the opposition- wall street likes consolidation and oligopolies)
And yeah, once your national industrial ecosystem is sufficiently powerful most countries suddenly get religion about removing all tarriffs everywhere. This is what America was like in the 90s - and they were just as obnoxious about that as they are about this - the exact opposite.
The argument that business competition within the Chinese market is stronger than within the US market is objectively untenable.
5 replies →
There was a lot of other stuff than just import substitution in the Asian miracle. See https://www.astralcodexten.com/p/book-review-how-asia-works