Comment by knowaveragejoe
10 months ago
The strange thing here is that you've chosen to defend the indefensible on the grounds of trying to "both sides" something that really is only from one side.
10 months ago
The strange thing here is that you've chosen to defend the indefensible on the grounds of trying to "both sides" something that really is only from one side.
Not only it's not "indedensible", but the full unedited transcript proves it was perfectly sane.