Comment by lyu07282 10 months ago Just no, your tasks should be idempotent. Distributed transactions are stupid. 2 comments lyu07282 Reply williamdclt 10 months ago They’re not talking about distributed transactions: it’s not about a task being published and consumed atomically, it’s about it being consumed and executed atomically. lyu07282 10 months ago the workers aren't talking to postgres directly, thats why you would need distributed transactions.
williamdclt 10 months ago They’re not talking about distributed transactions: it’s not about a task being published and consumed atomically, it’s about it being consumed and executed atomically. lyu07282 10 months ago the workers aren't talking to postgres directly, thats why you would need distributed transactions.
lyu07282 10 months ago the workers aren't talking to postgres directly, thats why you would need distributed transactions.
They’re not talking about distributed transactions: it’s not about a task being published and consumed atomically, it’s about it being consumed and executed atomically.
the workers aren't talking to postgres directly, thats why you would need distributed transactions.