← Back to context Comment by lyu07282 8 days ago Just no, your tasks should be idempotent. Distributed transactions are stupid. 2 comments lyu07282 Reply williamdclt 8 days ago They’re not talking about distributed transactions: it’s not about a task being published and consumed atomically, it’s about it being consumed and executed atomically. lyu07282 8 days ago the workers aren't talking to postgres directly, thats why you would need distributed transactions.
williamdclt 8 days ago They’re not talking about distributed transactions: it’s not about a task being published and consumed atomically, it’s about it being consumed and executed atomically. lyu07282 8 days ago the workers aren't talking to postgres directly, thats why you would need distributed transactions.
lyu07282 8 days ago the workers aren't talking to postgres directly, thats why you would need distributed transactions.
They’re not talking about distributed transactions: it’s not about a task being published and consumed atomically, it’s about it being consumed and executed atomically.
the workers aren't talking to postgres directly, thats why you would need distributed transactions.