Comment by titaphraz
2 months ago
A start would be banning of misleading statements and half-truths.
A panel of randomly selected 100 people will be the judge and jury.
2 months ago
A start would be banning of misleading statements and half-truths.
A panel of randomly selected 100 people will be the judge and jury.
What's the threshold they have to meet to ban? Half of them, give or take, will probably not be able to recognize the lie, and a sizeable portion of them would likely not be convinced in deliberation. It's also subject to nullification, e.g. "I know it's a lie, but it 'owns' the people I don't like"
Yep, it's hard. Let's deter it in the first place with imprisonment for the CEO if convicted. Ads will be amazingly informative.