Comment by amrrs
14 days ago
The entire licensing is such a mess and Mark Zuckerberg still thinks Llama 4 is open source!
> no commercial usage above 700M MAU
> prefix "llama" in any redistribution eg: fine-tuning
> mention "built with llama"
> add license notice in all redistribution
Who has above 700M MAU and doesn't have their own LLM?
Well, Wikipedia, but I take your point.
I am still dismayed how quickly we gave up on including the pre-training data as a requirement for "open-source" LLMs.
As someone who thinks LLMs as akin to Lisp expert systems (but in natural language): is like including the C source code to your Lisp compiler, but claiming the Lisp applications are merely "data" and shouldn't be included.
You forgot the most egregious term which is that users have to abide by an acceptable use policy that only allows you to use it for what Meta says you can.