How do those sites make money if advertising doesn’t exist?
A major challenge in journalism is because of the collapse in value of banner ads. No one but the very largest newspapers have sustainable businesses in the United States and they only do because of the critical mass they have reached with subscribers.
I subscribe to a magazine that publishes tests and reviews of everything from lawn fertiliser to spices, via vacuums and mobile phones. It costs money and I trust that they are not bribed.
It seems rather certain an end to advertising would mean the death of lots of low-quality "media".
Good information is valuable. When internet didn’t exist people paid good money for newspaper and magazines because they provided good information which people found valuable.
Do such things exist? I am pretty sure that any review site today has many "inorganic" reviews on them, and products recommended just because vendor paid more.
Or consumers could contribute back to them making them free resources. Remember the early internet? It was free and it had no ads. That until the pop-ups and flashy banner ads showed up murkying the waters. It appears that advertising inherently wants to agressively take all out attention.
You spam forums, send emails and abuse any free resources you can find. If you can find them, that is, because without ad revenue they would be closing pretty quickly.
It'd be a very different world, I anticipate a lot of paywalls and secret deals.
Post it on your windowsill? Have it show up in the search results or ‘new apps’ list on the App Store?
TV brands can be set up in a department store? Like we’ve done for ages?
Reputable review sites are better than random advertisements
How do those sites make money if advertising doesn’t exist?
A major challenge in journalism is because of the collapse in value of banner ads. No one but the very largest newspapers have sustainable businesses in the United States and they only do because of the critical mass they have reached with subscribers.
I subscribe to a magazine that publishes tests and reviews of everything from lawn fertiliser to spices, via vacuums and mobile phones. It costs money and I trust that they are not bribed.
It seems rather certain an end to advertising would mean the death of lots of low-quality "media".
Good information is valuable. When internet didn’t exist people paid good money for newspaper and magazines because they provided good information which people found valuable.
Do such things exist? I am pretty sure that any review site today has many "inorganic" reviews on them, and products recommended just because vendor paid more.
The context of this thread is that vendors wouldn't be able to pay review sites.
Because its not illegal to do shenanigans and they indeed invaded all product review sites with dishonest reviews
Then they can't be free, consumers need to pay for them.
Or consumers could contribute back to them making them free resources. Remember the early internet? It was free and it had no ads. That until the pop-ups and flashy banner ads showed up murkying the waters. It appears that advertising inherently wants to agressively take all out attention.
2 replies →
Except that reviews are ads...
Yet another reason to ban paid ads.
You spam forums, send emails and abuse any free resources you can find. If you can find them, that is, because without ad revenue they would be closing pretty quickly.
It'd be a very different world, I anticipate a lot of paywalls and secret deals.