Comment by sgt 10 months ago It's not that smooth looking if a refresh takes 500 milliseconds. Then it flickers. 5 comments sgt Reply foobahify 10 months ago 500ms means a slow connection, high latency or significant bloat.Optimising the page and using a CDN can help alot.It is a shame HTML doesn't have rel="swap" in links to "swap" in a new page. axegon_ 10 months ago Oh yeah a 15 second spinning circle and 250mb memory is sooooo much better than a 500ms refresh </sarcasm> earthnail 10 months ago A 2s spinning circle may indeed be better than a 500ms flashing reload. Try it on your mom (“waaah why did it flash??”).I also dislike SPAs but there is business value in this slow spinner that you shouldn’t discount.Luckily, turbo or htmx solve this just as well. And maybe even more importantly, I can’t think of a modern browser that still flickers. sgt 10 months ago I don't disagree with you :) mattgreenrocks 10 months ago If the layout hasn’t changed, then there is no flicker that I can tell on Chrome/FF at 144hz.
foobahify 10 months ago 500ms means a slow connection, high latency or significant bloat.Optimising the page and using a CDN can help alot.It is a shame HTML doesn't have rel="swap" in links to "swap" in a new page.
axegon_ 10 months ago Oh yeah a 15 second spinning circle and 250mb memory is sooooo much better than a 500ms refresh </sarcasm> earthnail 10 months ago A 2s spinning circle may indeed be better than a 500ms flashing reload. Try it on your mom (“waaah why did it flash??”).I also dislike SPAs but there is business value in this slow spinner that you shouldn’t discount.Luckily, turbo or htmx solve this just as well. And maybe even more importantly, I can’t think of a modern browser that still flickers. sgt 10 months ago I don't disagree with you :)
earthnail 10 months ago A 2s spinning circle may indeed be better than a 500ms flashing reload. Try it on your mom (“waaah why did it flash??”).I also dislike SPAs but there is business value in this slow spinner that you shouldn’t discount.Luckily, turbo or htmx solve this just as well. And maybe even more importantly, I can’t think of a modern browser that still flickers.
mattgreenrocks 10 months ago If the layout hasn’t changed, then there is no flicker that I can tell on Chrome/FF at 144hz.
500ms means a slow connection, high latency or significant bloat.
Optimising the page and using a CDN can help alot.
It is a shame HTML doesn't have rel="swap" in links to "swap" in a new page.
Oh yeah a 15 second spinning circle and 250mb memory is sooooo much better than a 500ms refresh </sarcasm>
A 2s spinning circle may indeed be better than a 500ms flashing reload. Try it on your mom (“waaah why did it flash??”).
I also dislike SPAs but there is business value in this slow spinner that you shouldn’t discount.
Luckily, turbo or htmx solve this just as well. And maybe even more importantly, I can’t think of a modern browser that still flickers.
I don't disagree with you :)
If the layout hasn’t changed, then there is no flicker that I can tell on Chrome/FF at 144hz.