Comment by nylonstrung
9 days ago
Doesn't latency make this dangerous?
At a BAC of 0.08 (legal limit in US) drivers have reaction time delayed by only 60-120ms but crash risk is 10x compared to sober
Lack of depth perception probably compounds this?
9 days ago
Doesn't latency make this dangerous?
At a BAC of 0.08 (legal limit in US) drivers have reaction time delayed by only 60-120ms but crash risk is 10x compared to sober
Lack of depth perception probably compounds this?
Even 100ms slower reaction times doesn't put most people outside the normal range: https://www.frontiersin.org/files/Articles/133421/fnhum-09-0...
If that was too much, we wouldn't let people in their 50s drive.
> At a BAC of 0.08 (legal limit in US) drivers have reaction time delayed by only 60-120ms but crash risk is 10x compared to sober
I'm not sure that slower reaction times are the only effect of alcohol consumption.
Sure, the other effects is that they're much more likely to be driving at night, overextended their waking hours, distracted by friends / a date / a prostitute, and driving a route that they do not normally drive.
How could you not be 10x more likely to crash than the nurse getting off at 2am who has driven the route a thousand times and knows all the bad blind spots / bad intersections / is still well within her normal waking hours. That is much closer to the normal profile of the sober people who are out driving during prime drinking hours.
Have you seen the 'latency' of the average driver on the road these days?
Most people appear to take about 2 seconds to respond to any change in conditions.