Comment by flanked-evergl 10 months ago cite? 18 comments flanked-evergl Reply ceejayoz 10 months ago https://www.reuters.com/world/us/doge-staffer-big-balls-prov...> The best-known member of Elon Musk's U.S. DOGE Service team of technologists once provided support to a cybercrime gang that bragged about trafficking in stolen data and cyberstalking an FBI agent, according to digital records reviewed by Reuters. BurnGpuBurn 10 months ago > Reuters could not independently verify EGodly's boasts of cybercriminal activity flanked-evergl 10 months ago [flagged] ceejayoz 10 months ago Didn't you get a pretty good answer - from a Federal court - last time you asked the same question? https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43557456 10 replies → randunel 10 months ago Is the article unclear? Would people who collaborate with known criminal groups pass basic background checks?Granted, the sample size is low, but it doesn't look likely the rest of the gang would be any different. 1 reply → bryanrasmussen 10 months ago a basic background check would invalidate someone with the described background. boesboes 10 months ago [flagged]
ceejayoz 10 months ago https://www.reuters.com/world/us/doge-staffer-big-balls-prov...> The best-known member of Elon Musk's U.S. DOGE Service team of technologists once provided support to a cybercrime gang that bragged about trafficking in stolen data and cyberstalking an FBI agent, according to digital records reviewed by Reuters. BurnGpuBurn 10 months ago > Reuters could not independently verify EGodly's boasts of cybercriminal activity flanked-evergl 10 months ago [flagged] ceejayoz 10 months ago Didn't you get a pretty good answer - from a Federal court - last time you asked the same question? https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43557456 10 replies → randunel 10 months ago Is the article unclear? Would people who collaborate with known criminal groups pass basic background checks?Granted, the sample size is low, but it doesn't look likely the rest of the gang would be any different. 1 reply → bryanrasmussen 10 months ago a basic background check would invalidate someone with the described background. boesboes 10 months ago [flagged]
BurnGpuBurn 10 months ago > Reuters could not independently verify EGodly's boasts of cybercriminal activity
flanked-evergl 10 months ago [flagged] ceejayoz 10 months ago Didn't you get a pretty good answer - from a Federal court - last time you asked the same question? https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43557456 10 replies → randunel 10 months ago Is the article unclear? Would people who collaborate with known criminal groups pass basic background checks?Granted, the sample size is low, but it doesn't look likely the rest of the gang would be any different. 1 reply → bryanrasmussen 10 months ago a basic background check would invalidate someone with the described background. boesboes 10 months ago [flagged]
ceejayoz 10 months ago Didn't you get a pretty good answer - from a Federal court - last time you asked the same question? https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43557456 10 replies →
randunel 10 months ago Is the article unclear? Would people who collaborate with known criminal groups pass basic background checks?Granted, the sample size is low, but it doesn't look likely the rest of the gang would be any different. 1 reply →
bryanrasmussen 10 months ago a basic background check would invalidate someone with the described background.
https://www.reuters.com/world/us/doge-staffer-big-balls-prov...
> The best-known member of Elon Musk's U.S. DOGE Service team of technologists once provided support to a cybercrime gang that bragged about trafficking in stolen data and cyberstalking an FBI agent, according to digital records reviewed by Reuters.
> Reuters could not independently verify EGodly's boasts of cybercriminal activity
[flagged]
Didn't you get a pretty good answer - from a Federal court - last time you asked the same question? https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43557456
10 replies →
Is the article unclear? Would people who collaborate with known criminal groups pass basic background checks?
Granted, the sample size is low, but it doesn't look likely the rest of the gang would be any different.
1 reply →
a basic background check would invalidate someone with the described background.
[flagged]