Comment by Suppafly

>I won’t pretend to know the technical details (as the other replies do) but I want to make a point for the “pedagogical” effect here, which I agree with the author. The way I interpret the article, it’s not supposed to be a deep, theoretical treatise on the subject; more of an introductory, “intuitive” take on it.

There are ways to teach things at a conceptual level without teaching them incorrectly though, especially when writing for an adult audience.