Ask HN: Why so many companies reducing middle management recently?
6 hours ago
I understand why you’d want to reduce middle management and eliminate layers of hierarchy
But why would companies all do it at the same time like it’s a trend?
6 hours ago
I understand why you’d want to reduce middle management and eliminate layers of hierarchy
But why would companies all do it at the same time like it’s a trend?
It’s a mix of cost-cutting, efficiency goals, and the rise of AI tools replacing coordination roles. And i think post-COVID remote work showed many orgs that fewer layers can still function. so now it's a trend driven by both necessity and FOMO on leaner structures.
>and the rise of AI tools replacing coordination roles
Despite working in technology sector that should see fads sooner than other fields, I've not seen or heard of any coordination roles being replaced with AI in any level of management yet, or even talks about incorporating it
>the rise of AI tools replacing coordination roles
Can you list these tools?
Professional managers may not be able to do any actual work or bring about effective change /management and are thus just a layer for decision making/blocking and organisational hierarchy without crystal clear impact
In my experience they didn't. The managers did something. Witout them, senior coders become that layer of management.
They spend less time coding and more time managing.
So the company is paying for that organizing work all the same.
Probably overpaying for it, since a level up coder is now doing cross-level-down management and doing less architecture as a result.
People are susceptible to peer pressure. You see other people doing it, you want to do it yourself
When interest rates were effectively zero, companies were borrowing and spending without any concern. In good times, the middle management layer tends to grow faster than the productive workers. Easier to hire folks when the criteria are vague. So when conditions turn around, upper management looks to where the greatest proportion of expenses without corresponding profits lie -- cut middle management.
Market in general chases trends. That being hiring or firing. And reducing cost is a tool with proven record to increase stock price in at least short term. And they want to get that increase from somewhere.
Not that there isn't bloat in many places.
If it looks like that its cause they are all missing quarterly targets given to Wall St previously. Standard playbook when that happens - cut costs/off shore/outsource/layoff/sell off teams etc