Comment by semiquaver
2 days ago
This is pure luddism. A human could have done the exact same thing. I’ll also point out that in this case the most confident guess was 200 miles off and the second correct guess was only down to the city level. Not remotely what anyone would consider precise.
The fact that it got it wrong was one of the reasons I picked that example: it's much more interesting that way.
If you feed it a photo with a clear landmark it will get the location exactly right.
If you feed it a photo that's a close up of a brick wall it won't have a chance.
What's interesting is how well it can do on this range of tasks. If you don't think that's at least interesting I'm not sure what I can do for you.
A skilled human can do the same thing but not everyone is open to offering this sort of services for certain purposes.
Making a tool like this trained on existing map services, for example Google Street images, gives everyone, no matter who, the potential to find someone in no time.
These tools are growing like crazy, how long will it take before someone will "democratize" the "location services market"...
> but not everyone is open to offering this sort of services for certain purposes.
Sorry but I call bull on this. Put it on one of the chans with a sob story and it gets "solved" in seconds. Or reddit w/ something bait like "my capitalist boss threatened to let my puppy starve because he wants profits, AITA if I glitter bomb his office?"...
for now. These things have a way of very quickly going from somewhat-ok to superhuman in months