Comment by Aurornis
2 months ago
This was a coincidence.
That’s why it’s something you observed one time 5-6 years ago, not something that happens repeatedly in a testable way.
2 months ago
This was a coincidence.
That’s why it’s something you observed one time 5-6 years ago, not something that happens repeatedly in a testable way.
Isn’t it more likely it’s not a coincidence though?
How often does someone look at their phone over 5-6 years?
Having one incidence where you’re talking about something and then you also see that something on your phone out of 2000 days of using a phone is definitely more likely to be coincidence.
How often do you think this person did experiments? It is a study with n=1 but the unrelated metric of how many times something else happens does not influence the likelihood of a false positive
1 reply →