Comment by fracus 1 year ago "We're"? Unabated capitalism. 2 comments fracus Reply Y-bar 1 year ago I suppose it means the "general we", as in society at large or at least a dominant section of, as opposed the "specific we". fracus 1 year ago I think I was annoyed at the generalization when the specific cause was obvious. Using the royal "we" seems like an egregious misappropriation of responsibility given many people specifically vote against unabated capitalism.
Y-bar 1 year ago I suppose it means the "general we", as in society at large or at least a dominant section of, as opposed the "specific we". fracus 1 year ago I think I was annoyed at the generalization when the specific cause was obvious. Using the royal "we" seems like an egregious misappropriation of responsibility given many people specifically vote against unabated capitalism.
fracus 1 year ago I think I was annoyed at the generalization when the specific cause was obvious. Using the royal "we" seems like an egregious misappropriation of responsibility given many people specifically vote against unabated capitalism.
I suppose it means the "general we", as in society at large or at least a dominant section of, as opposed the "specific we".
I think I was annoyed at the generalization when the specific cause was obvious. Using the royal "we" seems like an egregious misappropriation of responsibility given many people specifically vote against unabated capitalism.