Comment by fracus 2 months ago "We're"? Unabated capitalism. 2 comments fracus Reply Y-bar 2 months ago I suppose it means the "general we", as in society at large or at least a dominant section of, as opposed the "specific we". fracus 2 months ago I think I was annoyed at the generalization when the specific cause was obvious. Using the royal "we" seems like an egregious misappropriation of responsibility given many people specifically vote against unabated capitalism.
Y-bar 2 months ago I suppose it means the "general we", as in society at large or at least a dominant section of, as opposed the "specific we". fracus 2 months ago I think I was annoyed at the generalization when the specific cause was obvious. Using the royal "we" seems like an egregious misappropriation of responsibility given many people specifically vote against unabated capitalism.
fracus 2 months ago I think I was annoyed at the generalization when the specific cause was obvious. Using the royal "we" seems like an egregious misappropriation of responsibility given many people specifically vote against unabated capitalism.
I suppose it means the "general we", as in society at large or at least a dominant section of, as opposed the "specific we".
I think I was annoyed at the generalization when the specific cause was obvious. Using the royal "we" seems like an egregious misappropriation of responsibility given many people specifically vote against unabated capitalism.