← Back to context Comment by fracus 10 months ago "We're"? Unabated capitalism. 2 comments fracus Reply Y-bar 10 months ago I suppose it means the "general we", as in society at large or at least a dominant section of, as opposed the "specific we". fracus 10 months ago I think I was annoyed at the generalization when the specific cause was obvious. Using the royal "we" seems like an egregious misappropriation of responsibility given many people specifically vote against unabated capitalism.
Y-bar 10 months ago I suppose it means the "general we", as in society at large or at least a dominant section of, as opposed the "specific we". fracus 10 months ago I think I was annoyed at the generalization when the specific cause was obvious. Using the royal "we" seems like an egregious misappropriation of responsibility given many people specifically vote against unabated capitalism.
fracus 10 months ago I think I was annoyed at the generalization when the specific cause was obvious. Using the royal "we" seems like an egregious misappropriation of responsibility given many people specifically vote against unabated capitalism.
I suppose it means the "general we", as in society at large or at least a dominant section of, as opposed the "specific we".
I think I was annoyed at the generalization when the specific cause was obvious. Using the royal "we" seems like an egregious misappropriation of responsibility given many people specifically vote against unabated capitalism.