People trust legal advice generated by ChatGPT more than a lawyer 9 months ago 4 comments mdp2021 Reply Add to library mdp2021 9 months ago It is suggested that again this is an effect of training towards "sounding well" as opposed to alethics.The results in an image: https://dl.acm.org/cms/10.1145/3706598.3713470/asset/95dbaf8...--From the actual paper ( https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3706598.3713470 ):> We used ChatGPT-4o to generate the LLM-generated prompts, while UK-based lawyers generated the lawyer-generated adviceIt would have been nice to also have layers assess the LLM output... yawpitch 9 months ago A man who [uses the stochastic average of the publicly-accessible Internet as his] lawyer has a [future convict] for a client. bufferoverflow 9 months ago Would be good to know if ChatGPT is better or worse than an average lawyer. I'd bet when it comes to a bit more obscure law knowledge, it's unbeatable. treetalker 9 months ago Not a chance at the moment, and not for the future as far as I can see it.I commented on a similar point in a duplicate post: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43819389Perhaps the mods could combine the dupes.
mdp2021 9 months ago It is suggested that again this is an effect of training towards "sounding well" as opposed to alethics.The results in an image: https://dl.acm.org/cms/10.1145/3706598.3713470/asset/95dbaf8...--From the actual paper ( https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3706598.3713470 ):> We used ChatGPT-4o to generate the LLM-generated prompts, while UK-based lawyers generated the lawyer-generated adviceIt would have been nice to also have layers assess the LLM output...
yawpitch 9 months ago A man who [uses the stochastic average of the publicly-accessible Internet as his] lawyer has a [future convict] for a client.
bufferoverflow 9 months ago Would be good to know if ChatGPT is better or worse than an average lawyer. I'd bet when it comes to a bit more obscure law knowledge, it's unbeatable. treetalker 9 months ago Not a chance at the moment, and not for the future as far as I can see it.I commented on a similar point in a duplicate post: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43819389Perhaps the mods could combine the dupes.
treetalker 9 months ago Not a chance at the moment, and not for the future as far as I can see it.I commented on a similar point in a duplicate post: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43819389Perhaps the mods could combine the dupes.
It is suggested that again this is an effect of training towards "sounding well" as opposed to alethics.
The results in an image: https://dl.acm.org/cms/10.1145/3706598.3713470/asset/95dbaf8...
--
From the actual paper ( https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3706598.3713470 ):
> We used ChatGPT-4o to generate the LLM-generated prompts, while UK-based lawyers generated the lawyer-generated advice
It would have been nice to also have layers assess the LLM output...
A man who [uses the stochastic average of the publicly-accessible Internet as his] lawyer has a [future convict] for a client.
Would be good to know if ChatGPT is better or worse than an average lawyer. I'd bet when it comes to a bit more obscure law knowledge, it's unbeatable.
Not a chance at the moment, and not for the future as far as I can see it.
I commented on a similar point in a duplicate post: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43819389
Perhaps the mods could combine the dupes.