More bad faith talking points - which have been addressed by other commenters in other sub-threads responding to you. (I am able to read those, you know)
This is a dead horse. You're in the wrong. Please do not engage with me any more.
they haven't though. feel free to post a paper showing that fluoride ingestion is good for you. there's no dispute that fluoride contact on the teeth is good.
there are plenty of papers showing that *ingestion* may be bad for you and results in lower IQ. feel free to research.
More bad faith talking points - which have been addressed by other commenters in other sub-threads responding to you. (I am able to read those, you know)
This is a dead horse. You're in the wrong. Please do not engage with me any more.
they haven't though. feel free to post a paper showing that fluoride ingestion is good for you. there's no dispute that fluoride contact on the teeth is good.
there are plenty of papers showing that *ingestion* may be bad for you and results in lower IQ. feel free to research.
https://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/research/assessments/noncancer/com...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sealioning
> Default water, lol. What an incredibly, terribly, dumb argument.
> More bad faith talking points
Do you talk to people like this in person? If not, why not? (If so, how's that working out for you?)
Hello, Pro-RFK policy guy!
I see you're taking a play from the right-wing playbook: If you can't refute a thing you want to refute, complain about decorum instead.
2 replies →