Comment by geor9e
9 months ago
>Ridiculous headline implying the existance of non-generative LLMs
>Baited into clicking
>Article about generative LLMs
>It's a buzzfeed employee
9 months ago
>Ridiculous headline implying the existance of non-generative LLMs
>Baited into clicking
>Article about generative LLMs
>It's a buzzfeed employee
The reason I added "generative" to the headline is because of the mention about the important use of text embedding models that are indeed non-generative LLMs and I did not want to start a semantics war if I did not explicitly specify "generative LLMs." (the headline would flow better without it)
Oooh, that makes more sense. To be honest, I only started reading the article with the sole mission of answering the question: what the heck is a non-generative LLM? I had never heard of that. I thought it would be answered explicitly in the first few sentences. As sentence after sentence passed and it didn't even seem to acknowledge the tension of that elephant in the room, my frustration grew beyond what I could concentrate on, and I found it difficult to continue reading, assuming I'd been clickbaited by slop or something. But now that I have that context it makes it a lot more readable.