Comment by mdhb

1 year ago

@dang why is this flagged? The flagging system on this site is so incredibly bad. It’s always a tiny handful of users trying to control what others can see with zero logical consistency.

I'm not surprised, it's a horribly written article, like a paragraph of content stretched out over article-length by AI.

I flagged earlier because the first submission appeared to be blogspam by a new account posting only from that domain. The replacement article from Android Authority is much better.

Perhaps that's why: two total submissions from this site and both are added by same green account registered 7 days ago.

I agree, can anybody just willy nilly flag any post?

  • In practice it bears almost zero resemblance to its stated functionality and instead is really just an extension of personal preferences of a tiny minority of people. It’s embarrassingly unfit for purpose. This happens all the time where stories get flagged for no reason.

    • It's not a tiny group of people. The karma threshold for flagging is deliberately kept low so this isn't the case.

      > This happens all the time where stories get flagged for no reason.

      It's not for no reason—it just feels that way when you see flags on an article that you think is a good one for HN.

      Judging from what else the same users have flagged, along with the responses you got in this thread, my guess is that they thought the submitted article (https://www.squaredtech.co/googles-desktop-view-android-phon...) wasn't good enough for HN. Indeed, it has the markings of blogspam (content lifted from other sources).

      Normally we'd leave the flags alone on a post like this, but the comments in this thread are surprisingly good, so I've turned off the flags and replaced the URL with an earlier article which has the same material and which in fact, it (almost?) looks like the other article was cribbed from.

      6 replies →