← Back to context Comment by abrichr 8 hours ago https://archive.is/vWelf 12 comments abrichr Reply OJFord 8 hours ago The submitted isn't paywalled or down, are you expecting something to happen to it? OJFord 7 minutes ago Bloody hell, I was only curious! It wasn't paywalled for me, I read it no problem. avree 6 hours ago Perhaps you are logged in with a "STAT Account"? When I load the link, it prompts me to create one in order to view the article. OJFord 8 minutes ago Nope, never heard of Stat before. I could read it fine, no paywall, not sure maybe geographic or just hitting different users :shrug: Sabinus 5 hours ago Interesting, I didn't get that prompt. Read the whole thing fine, no login. 1 reply → southernplaces7 8 hours ago Lucky you, was paywalled for me. Good thing they posted the link. OJFord 6 minutes ago Ok, yeah, great, I didn't hit that so I was just curious why they did, thinking must be some other reason. santa_boy 6 hours ago paywalled for me too OJFord 5 minutes ago Wasn't for me, as I said. burnt-resistor 7 hours ago Paywalled. OJFord 5 minutes ago Wasn't for me, as I said.
OJFord 8 hours ago The submitted isn't paywalled or down, are you expecting something to happen to it? OJFord 7 minutes ago Bloody hell, I was only curious! It wasn't paywalled for me, I read it no problem. avree 6 hours ago Perhaps you are logged in with a "STAT Account"? When I load the link, it prompts me to create one in order to view the article. OJFord 8 minutes ago Nope, never heard of Stat before. I could read it fine, no paywall, not sure maybe geographic or just hitting different users :shrug: Sabinus 5 hours ago Interesting, I didn't get that prompt. Read the whole thing fine, no login. 1 reply → southernplaces7 8 hours ago Lucky you, was paywalled for me. Good thing they posted the link. OJFord 6 minutes ago Ok, yeah, great, I didn't hit that so I was just curious why they did, thinking must be some other reason. santa_boy 6 hours ago paywalled for me too OJFord 5 minutes ago Wasn't for me, as I said. burnt-resistor 7 hours ago Paywalled. OJFord 5 minutes ago Wasn't for me, as I said.
OJFord 7 minutes ago Bloody hell, I was only curious! It wasn't paywalled for me, I read it no problem.
avree 6 hours ago Perhaps you are logged in with a "STAT Account"? When I load the link, it prompts me to create one in order to view the article. OJFord 8 minutes ago Nope, never heard of Stat before. I could read it fine, no paywall, not sure maybe geographic or just hitting different users :shrug: Sabinus 5 hours ago Interesting, I didn't get that prompt. Read the whole thing fine, no login. 1 reply →
OJFord 8 minutes ago Nope, never heard of Stat before. I could read it fine, no paywall, not sure maybe geographic or just hitting different users :shrug:
Sabinus 5 hours ago Interesting, I didn't get that prompt. Read the whole thing fine, no login. 1 reply →
southernplaces7 8 hours ago Lucky you, was paywalled for me. Good thing they posted the link. OJFord 6 minutes ago Ok, yeah, great, I didn't hit that so I was just curious why they did, thinking must be some other reason.
OJFord 6 minutes ago Ok, yeah, great, I didn't hit that so I was just curious why they did, thinking must be some other reason.
The submitted isn't paywalled or down, are you expecting something to happen to it?
Bloody hell, I was only curious! It wasn't paywalled for me, I read it no problem.
Perhaps you are logged in with a "STAT Account"? When I load the link, it prompts me to create one in order to view the article.
Nope, never heard of Stat before. I could read it fine, no paywall, not sure maybe geographic or just hitting different users :shrug:
Interesting, I didn't get that prompt. Read the whole thing fine, no login.
1 reply →
Lucky you, was paywalled for me. Good thing they posted the link.
Ok, yeah, great, I didn't hit that so I was just curious why they did, thinking must be some other reason.
paywalled for me too
Wasn't for me, as I said.
Paywalled.
Wasn't for me, as I said.