Comment by abrichr 7 months ago https://archive.is/vWelf 15 comments abrichr Reply 1vuio0pswjnm7 7 months ago Try disabling Javascript. OJFord 7 months ago The submitted isn't paywalled or down, are you expecting something to happen to it? avree 7 months ago Perhaps you are logged in with a "STAT Account"? When I load the link, it prompts me to create one in order to view the article. Sabinus 7 months ago Interesting, I didn't get that prompt. Read the whole thing fine, no login. 1 reply → OJFord 7 months ago Nope, never heard of Stat before. I could read it fine, no paywall, not sure maybe geographic or just hitting different users :shrug: southernplaces7 7 months ago Lucky you, was paywalled for me. Good thing they posted the link. OJFord 7 months ago Ok, yeah, great, I didn't hit that so I was just curious why they did, thinking must be some other reason. OJFord 7 months ago Bloody hell, I was only curious! It wasn't paywalled for me, I read it no problem. burnt-resistor 7 months ago Paywalled. OJFord 7 months ago Wasn't for me, as I said. 2 replies → santa_boy 7 months ago paywalled for me too OJFord 7 months ago Wasn't for me, as I said.
OJFord 7 months ago The submitted isn't paywalled or down, are you expecting something to happen to it? avree 7 months ago Perhaps you are logged in with a "STAT Account"? When I load the link, it prompts me to create one in order to view the article. Sabinus 7 months ago Interesting, I didn't get that prompt. Read the whole thing fine, no login. 1 reply → OJFord 7 months ago Nope, never heard of Stat before. I could read it fine, no paywall, not sure maybe geographic or just hitting different users :shrug: southernplaces7 7 months ago Lucky you, was paywalled for me. Good thing they posted the link. OJFord 7 months ago Ok, yeah, great, I didn't hit that so I was just curious why they did, thinking must be some other reason. OJFord 7 months ago Bloody hell, I was only curious! It wasn't paywalled for me, I read it no problem. burnt-resistor 7 months ago Paywalled. OJFord 7 months ago Wasn't for me, as I said. 2 replies → santa_boy 7 months ago paywalled for me too OJFord 7 months ago Wasn't for me, as I said.
avree 7 months ago Perhaps you are logged in with a "STAT Account"? When I load the link, it prompts me to create one in order to view the article. Sabinus 7 months ago Interesting, I didn't get that prompt. Read the whole thing fine, no login. 1 reply → OJFord 7 months ago Nope, never heard of Stat before. I could read it fine, no paywall, not sure maybe geographic or just hitting different users :shrug:
Sabinus 7 months ago Interesting, I didn't get that prompt. Read the whole thing fine, no login. 1 reply →
OJFord 7 months ago Nope, never heard of Stat before. I could read it fine, no paywall, not sure maybe geographic or just hitting different users :shrug:
southernplaces7 7 months ago Lucky you, was paywalled for me. Good thing they posted the link. OJFord 7 months ago Ok, yeah, great, I didn't hit that so I was just curious why they did, thinking must be some other reason.
OJFord 7 months ago Ok, yeah, great, I didn't hit that so I was just curious why they did, thinking must be some other reason.
OJFord 7 months ago Bloody hell, I was only curious! It wasn't paywalled for me, I read it no problem.
Try disabling Javascript.
The submitted isn't paywalled or down, are you expecting something to happen to it?
Perhaps you are logged in with a "STAT Account"? When I load the link, it prompts me to create one in order to view the article.
Interesting, I didn't get that prompt. Read the whole thing fine, no login.
1 reply →
Nope, never heard of Stat before. I could read it fine, no paywall, not sure maybe geographic or just hitting different users :shrug:
Lucky you, was paywalled for me. Good thing they posted the link.
Ok, yeah, great, I didn't hit that so I was just curious why they did, thinking must be some other reason.
Bloody hell, I was only curious! It wasn't paywalled for me, I read it no problem.
Paywalled.
Wasn't for me, as I said.
2 replies →
paywalled for me too
Wasn't for me, as I said.