Comment by OJFord 12 hours ago The submitted isn't paywalled or down, are you expecting something to happen to it? 11 comments OJFord Reply avree 10 hours ago Perhaps you are logged in with a "STAT Account"? When I load the link, it prompts me to create one in order to view the article. Sabinus 9 hours ago Interesting, I didn't get that prompt. Read the whole thing fine, no login. OJFord 4 hours ago Yup, same, hence my (oh so offensive, apparently) comment asking the reason, assuming it must be something else. OJFord 5 hours ago Nope, never heard of Stat before. I could read it fine, no paywall, not sure maybe geographic or just hitting different users :shrug: southernplaces7 12 hours ago Lucky you, was paywalled for me. Good thing they posted the link. OJFord 4 hours ago Ok, yeah, great, I didn't hit that so I was just curious why they did, thinking must be some other reason. OJFord 5 hours ago Bloody hell, I was only curious! It wasn't paywalled for me, I read it no problem. burnt-resistor 12 hours ago Paywalled. OJFord 4 hours ago Wasn't for me, as I said. santa_boy 10 hours ago paywalled for me too OJFord 4 hours ago Wasn't for me, as I said.
avree 10 hours ago Perhaps you are logged in with a "STAT Account"? When I load the link, it prompts me to create one in order to view the article. Sabinus 9 hours ago Interesting, I didn't get that prompt. Read the whole thing fine, no login. OJFord 4 hours ago Yup, same, hence my (oh so offensive, apparently) comment asking the reason, assuming it must be something else. OJFord 5 hours ago Nope, never heard of Stat before. I could read it fine, no paywall, not sure maybe geographic or just hitting different users :shrug:
Sabinus 9 hours ago Interesting, I didn't get that prompt. Read the whole thing fine, no login. OJFord 4 hours ago Yup, same, hence my (oh so offensive, apparently) comment asking the reason, assuming it must be something else.
OJFord 4 hours ago Yup, same, hence my (oh so offensive, apparently) comment asking the reason, assuming it must be something else.
OJFord 5 hours ago Nope, never heard of Stat before. I could read it fine, no paywall, not sure maybe geographic or just hitting different users :shrug:
southernplaces7 12 hours ago Lucky you, was paywalled for me. Good thing they posted the link. OJFord 4 hours ago Ok, yeah, great, I didn't hit that so I was just curious why they did, thinking must be some other reason.
OJFord 4 hours ago Ok, yeah, great, I didn't hit that so I was just curious why they did, thinking must be some other reason.
OJFord 5 hours ago Bloody hell, I was only curious! It wasn't paywalled for me, I read it no problem.
Perhaps you are logged in with a "STAT Account"? When I load the link, it prompts me to create one in order to view the article.
Interesting, I didn't get that prompt. Read the whole thing fine, no login.
Yup, same, hence my (oh so offensive, apparently) comment asking the reason, assuming it must be something else.
Nope, never heard of Stat before. I could read it fine, no paywall, not sure maybe geographic or just hitting different users :shrug:
Lucky you, was paywalled for me. Good thing they posted the link.
Ok, yeah, great, I didn't hit that so I was just curious why they did, thinking must be some other reason.
Bloody hell, I was only curious! It wasn't paywalled for me, I read it no problem.
Paywalled.
Wasn't for me, as I said.
paywalled for me too
Wasn't for me, as I said.