← Back to context

Comment by p4bl0

1 year ago

I wholeheartedly agreee. Nano is quite awesome, it is battle-tested and already has more features than needed for a basic text editor. Actually, Nano is too often frowned upon as too-basic, but is actually has a few advanced features that basic editors do not have (e.g., keyboard macros). I'd argue that Nano is simple rather than basic :).

I tried discussing it here a few months ago but it did not took off: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41289773

I love nano and used it as my terminal editor on Linux.

Edit seems super approachable to newbies with it's mouse support in the menus. I love that and would love to see it in nano.